Document Actions

No writing allowed

Statement to CSHRA
by Candace Gorman
March 27, 2012

My last two trips to Guantanamo were the weeks of December 5, 2011 and July 10, 2011. I think it is fair to say that the procedures for attorney client visits change frequently however the changes during the last two visits were the most dramatic. Before I discuss those changes I want to backtrack just a bit. When I first started visiting my clients in 2006 I could bring with me attorney-client materials, including unclassified court pleadings, letters that I had sent to my clients and of course any notes of things that I wanted to discuss with my clients. A few years later—I want to say in 08 but I am not exactly sure when—we were not allowed to bring with us any materials that were not in English unless a government translator reviewed and OKd the materials. I was in the awkward position of having my attorney client mail that I would bring with me to make sure my client had received, being read by the military. I complained but to no avail—so I stopped bringing the Arabic translations and instead brought only my English versions of the letters. That was the process until this past year. When I went to visit my client in July I went through the usual screening—having my bag looked into and the food that I brought my client reviewed for contraband (straws, plastic ware, etc.) and then I walked over to the military lawyer desk and I was asked if I had anything with writing on it. I said “of course.” I was told that they wanted to review it and I said all I had with me was an unclassified version of my clients Traverse (the reply to his habeas petition) and I had a letter from the DOJ counsel telling me that this was the version that I was permitted to show my client. The military lawyer reviewed the materials and allowed them in. I was then told that I was not allowed to bring my wallet (which was in my brief case) into the meeting. I said “really?” I was told that I could put my wallet in the transport van and the escort would give it back to me after the meeting. No explanation was given to me as to why I could not bring my wallet.

In my December meeting I only brought with me a pad of paper with some notes on it to remind myself of things I wanted to discuss. After going through the usual screening I went over to the military lawyer desk and they asked if I had anything with me that had writing on it. I said “No, just some notes that I made.” I was then told that they wanted to look at the notes and I said “No.” That is when I was told that I could not bring into the meeting anything with writing on it unless they approved it. I told them I would not allow them to review my notes at which point I was told that I would have to put my notes back in the bus. Instead, I reviewed my notes as I was standing there and then tore the piece of paper into tiny pieces and threw my notes in the garbage. I was then asked if there was anything in my wallet with writing on it. I did not say “duhhhh.” I politely asked what they meant by that question and I was told if there was anything with writing on it-IDs-money, anything with writing-then my wallet could not go into the meeting either. I gave my wallet to the escort and walked into my meeting with my client. I did however have one thing with writing in my briefcase. I always carry a pocket edition of the constitution in my briefcase and when my brief case was screened no one mentioned it. It seemed to me to be the one thing I really needed in this day and age (and place) and since no one mentioned it during the screening I decided the constitution was safe, for now….

 

Personal tools